Reply from EbyccoAug 13, 2025
Hello, Elijah.
Since our founding, EBYCCO has always been customer-centric. Having operated in the US market for many years, we strive to proactively resolve our customers' issues. Honestly, we've never encountered a customer like you, fabricating so many stories, slandering us, and threatening us to get a refund. Don't you feel a bit embarrassed?
First, the E8 on our website is listed at $799, and the image shows a 33% discount, not the "50% off" you claimed. Do you think other customers wouldn't proactively review our website before placing an order?
Second, before placing your order, you inquired about our refurbished E8. We informed you that we were out of stock and would need to wait. Because our refurbished bikes are very popular, we recommended placing your order in advance to allow for restocking and prevent other customers from purchasing them. We ship them in the order they receive. You quickly placed an order for the refurbished E8 for $599, and we informed you in advance that you would need to wait for restocking. It's not like you claimed, "After my payment for the refurbished bike was processed, EBYCCO claimed it was suddenly unavailable." We have chat records for this information.
Third, the day after you placed your order, you urged us to ship the bike. We informed you in advance that a refurbished product wouldn't be ready that quickly. Three days after you placed your order, you continued to contact us, hoping for expedited delivery and expressing your disappointment at the delay. To expedite your bike delivery, we asked if you would be willing to pay an additional $150 for a brand new E8. You told us you were only willing to pay $90, and we ultimately settled on a $100 price difference. In other words, you received a brand new E8 for $699 (a brand new E8 costs $799). You were delighted and gladly accepted this price, expressing your gratitude for our resolution. However, you have stated on other review sites that we "forced" you to pay the $100.
Fourth, we regret that the bicycle you received had some minor scratches. These were minor damages incurred during shipping. We, the EBYCCO brand, stand by our promise that the bicycle we sent was indeed a brand new one. Judging from the pictures you provided, the scratches are negligible. You requested a $100 refund, but we refused. We offered to return the bicycle to us for a full refund. However, you refused and insisted on a $100 refund. Ultimately, we reached an agreement with you to refund you $60 as compensation, which you gladly accepted. These are the details of our email communication.
Fifth, regarding the email you received requesting a review of a refurbished E8 electric bike, it was automatically sent. Your original order included a link to a refurbished E8. After you paid the $100 difference, we didn't promptly update the order to include a brand-new E8. Therefore, the system sent you a review request for the original "refurbished E8." Unexpectedly, this became evidence of your threat. If we had actually sent you a refurbished E8, would we still have asked for a review? What business owner would jeopardize their own brand in this way?
Over the past two days, we've seen your malicious comments on various social media sites. We sincerely hope you'll remove some of your fabrications, as they're quite excessive. Therefore, we contacted you and offered to refund you the $40 difference (so you actually purchased a brand new E8 for $599). However, you refused, threatening us with your comments on various review sites. You demanded a further $290 refund in exchange for removing your malicious comments and writing positive reviews. We're curious if you've used this same tactic against other businesses to obtain further refunds. Is this a regular practice? We have email records of these.
We don't want to argue about who's right or wrong. We remain committed to addressing every customer's needs, but we do so on a fair and equal basis.