Reply from The Midas Touch Trading GroupAug 13, 2026
We want to clarify several points here because this review changed significantly after a refund dispute.
Your original review rated our community three stars and described it as a "Great community of traders." Your primary criticism at that time was that you expected your annual membership to include daily live trading.
At the time, we offered multiple membership tiers with different levels of access. The annual membership you purchased included Wednesday live trading, our educational content, and additional annual member benefits. Daily live trading was included in our VIP membership, which was a separate tier at a significantly different price. What was included with each membership was outlined before purchase.
We understand that you expected daily live trading to be included, but unfortunately that was not part of the membership you purchased.
After discovering this, you requested a refund. Our annual memberships were sold under a no refund policy. Mike and Troy nevertheless communicated with you directly in an effort to address your concerns. Following the refund dispute, this review was changed from three stars to one star and the characterization of our community changed substantially.
We also need to address the claim that the Crazy Horse strategy "works 40% of the time." We have no idea where that figure came from, and it does not represent our documented results. We also consistently teach members that learning and properly executing a trading strategy takes time. A few weeks of exposure to a strategy is not enough to make a definitive claim about its long term effectiveness.
We never guarantee profitability or a particular win rate for any individual trader. Trading involves risk, and results depend on many factors, including execution, risk management, consistency, experience, and whether the strategy is being followed correctly.
We welcome fair criticism, and we're happy to be held accountable for what we actually promise our members. What we can't agree with is characterizing the business as misleading because a membership did not include a feature that was part of a different membership tier, or presenting an unsupported 40% figure as the strategy's established win rate.
We wish you the best going forward.