Reply from ND AssessmentsFeb 4, 2025
We happily help 100s of individuals every year regain their driving privileges within the confines of their state’s requirements to legitimately reinstate their driver’s license. It is unfortunate that after numerous verbal and written efforts we have been unable to satisfy Sunshine. In the vast majority of cases, our clients are very satisfied with the help we provide them in their journey but occasionally there are times where the client disagrees with our professional opinion. Unfortunately, when the client has differing self-assessment, though we always listen, we won’t always necessarily be persuaded to agree with that opinion. We do provide refunds in circumstances where the client can provide proof that the assessment was rejected by the authority who required the assessment to be done. A rejected assessment is a sign that something was deficient in our service – something which is rare in our history of providing assessments online since 2004. In the case of this client we received no proof from the state licensing authority that our assessment was rejected.
If you are reading this review and have concerns or questions about how a substance abuse assessment functions or aids in reinstating your driver’s license, please feel free to reach out to our Director of Assessments at [email protected] We would be happy to explain the full process and consult with you even if you do not purchase our service to help you in this effort.
Furthermore, we feel that this unsatisfied customer’s reviews of us violates TrustPilot review standards. Specifically, our understanding is that reviews should not name individuals within the company and there should be one review per business transaction. Presently, Sunshine has left seven (7) 1-start reviews in reference to one business transaction with our company, and made references to specific individuals in our company in 5 of those reviews. Our belief is that a company with integrity can rely on their strong relationships with courts, employers, and legal professionals. It would be a sign of compromised integrity to change our professional opinion if we were to enable someone to restore their driving privileges without meeting the criteria directed by their state law. Refunding all fees in exchange for the removal of a bad review also violates our commitment to the public to provide honest and professional substance abuse assessments. Ultimately, we are willing to accept a negative review for the sake of our commitment to clinical integrity, adherence to state laws, and the safety of the traveling public.