The One PercentReviews of the-onepercent.com

Reply from The One PercentJun 2, 2026

Hey David. Coach Nick here, responding directly. We hold our guys to a very high standard inside The One Percent. That is what the brand is built on. Just because you invest in our program does not mean you will succeed. It takes hard work. Transparency is non-negotiable to us, so when someone decided to we open the actual data and let it speak. I refuse to hide behind corporate language and give a typical PR response, because this program changed my life as well as many others. Here is the deal. ON THE DEFAMATION CLAIM The statement you made regarding the google review is incorrect. If you open the Google review I left on your business. The first sentence reads "Was a client of a fitness coaching program that I am apart of." I never claimed to be a client of your law firm. I made it clear from the opening line that I was reviewing you as someone you hired to coach. That is documented public feedback from a service provider about a customer. Since you are a lawyer, I am sure you know that is not defamation. You left a public review about us. I left a public review about you. Public reviews work both ways. ON THE PROGRAM ITSELF Our coaching is built around metabolic priming. We progressively add food in for months to rebuild capacity BEFORE we ever pull it back for a cut. The cut is where most of the body composition change actually happens. We explain this clearly on the call before anyone signs up. Compliance is the cost of admission. Here is what your Trainerize data shows Start date: September 23, 2025 Cut phase began: January 2, 2026(you quit the 2nd week of January) Days nutrition logged across the engagement: 72 of 217 (33%) Habit completion: 532 of 2064 (26%) Here is some more data on your time in the program,. On the days you DID log, here is how accurate the tracking was against the macro targets we set for you. We have all of these records as a visual reference as well. We cannot fabricate these. Days where protein landed within +/-10g of target: 15% Days where carbs landed within +/-10g of target: 18% Days where BOTH protein and carbs hit target range: 9% Average miss from your daily calorie target: 165 calories Our standard for any nutrition adjustment is +/-1 to 10g on macros. You hit that standard on 9% of the days you logged. Even when you were tracking, you were not executing. Weeks into the cut you logged consistently: 1 Following weeks: logging dropped to 1 day, then to zero, and stayed at zero every week through May. You quit before the cut had a chance to do what the cut is designed to do. ON THE GOOGLE REVIEW AND THE DEROGATORY LANGUAGE I stand by every word I wrote. How someone shows up in one area is usually how they show up in others. A client who pays for work, fails to do their part, blames the provider when results do not come, then reaches for derogatory language and threatens with lawyers when the receipts get pulled out, is not someone I would hire to handle anything important in my life. Disappointed in the framing, not surprised by it. That is consistent with the pattern. TO ANYONE ELSE READING THIS People like this come and go in coaching. Always have, always will. The reason we hold the line every single time is because for every one client who quits and blames the program, there are hundreds of guys inside our community who are showing up, doing the work, and changing their lives(we have A LOT of proof to show for it). Guys who do not quit. Guys who carry what we call the One Percent mentality. If you want to see what the work actually produces, those are the stories worth looking at. Not this one. For anyone who wants to see the Google review I left on David's business in full, here are the receipts: https://bit.ly/wechtreceipts David, the door is open if you ever want to come back, actually do the work required, and finish what you started. Same terms as the day you signed up. Nick Priola Head Of Client Success, The One Percent

Reply from The One PercentMay 14, 2026

Victor, Thank you for your feedback. We have reviewed the timeline of your experience and would like to clarify what occurred. Your original appointment was scheduled for 4:00 PM EST. Our advisor was present on the Zoom call at the scheduled time and made multiple attempts to reach you via phone and text when you did not join. However, we acknowledge that we completely mishandled the second appointment booked shortly afterward. A scheduling system error incorrectly showed availability while our advisor was on another call, and our assistant lacked the visibility to resolve the conflict promptly. We take full responsibility for this oversight and understand why the resulting miscommunication was frustrating. We respect your time and regret that this experience did not meet our standard of service. We appreciate the feedback and wish you the best moving forward. — The One Percent

Reply from The One PercentMay 14, 2026

Leo, First, I want to sincerely apologize for the experience you had with our company last week. Regardless of whether we were ultimately the right fit for your needs, the way the communication was handled was not reflective of the standard we aim to uphold, and we completely understand why you felt disrespected and frustrated by the situation. To provide clarity, much of the communication leading up to your scheduled strategy call was being handled by Alexandra’s assistant and pre-call support systems. Alexandra herself did not personally manage the situation appropriately once the internal concern regarding our coaching criteria was raised. She was specifically instructed to call you directly, explain our program parameters, and handle the conversation respectfully and professionally. That did not happen, and instead you received a short text message with little explanation only minutes before your appointment. We agree that this was not a good look and not how we do business. We also understand why the timing felt especially frustrating and confusing considering you had openly shared that you were transgender early in the conversation and were met with encouraging responses afterward. From your perspective, it understandably appeared that the information had already been acknowledged and incorporated into the planning process. We recognize how receiving a cancellation at the last minute after continued engagement and confirmations would feel dismissive and hurtful. There was never any intention to disrespect you personally or make you feel devalued as an individual. The issue was handled poorly operationally and communication internally broke down in a way that should not have happened. That responsibility falls on us. While our coaching model and methodology are currently structured specifically around biological male physiology and the biomarker ranges, hormonal frameworks, and metabolic considerations we specialize in working with, we should have communicated that clearly, respectfully, and much earlier in the process. A brief text without proper explanation did not reflect the level of professionalism or empathy that you deserved. We appreciate you bringing this to our attention because situations like this highlight where we need to improve both operationally and personally as a team. We are already addressing the breakdown internally to ensure this type of experience does not happen again. With that said, we would respectfully ask that you reconsider and remove the review. We fully understand your frustration and accept responsibility for the poor communication, but we do hope this explanation provides better context around what happened and reassures you that there was never malicious intent or personal discrimination behind the situation. Again, we sincerely apologize for the frustration, confusion, and disappointment this caused. Wishing you nothing but the best moving forward. — The One Percent