Reply from American Web BuildersFeb 17, 2026
Hi Malachi,
We strongly dispute the claims made in this review and note that it has been repeatedly edited over time to introduce new allegations while disregarding the documented history of the project.
The website was developed, revised, delivered, reviewed, and approved in accordance with the agreed scope of work. The project was not closed unilaterally; it was completed following client acceptance and handover of all deliverables. The claim that no functional website was delivered is directly contradicted by the approvals, communications, revisions, and records maintained throughout the project.
We also wish we had the option of directly uploading supporting evidence here, including screenshots where you, Malachi, explicitly confirmed that the site was “completed,” which in industry terms indicates that the client has reviewed and tested the platform and confirmed it is functioning in line with their expectations at the time of approval.
What is particularly concerning is the continued reliance on opinions from third-party developers who were never involved in the project, have no knowledge of the agreed scope, revision history, approvals, or deliverables, and may have a financial interest in recommending redevelopment. These opinions are being presented as fact despite lacking the full context of the project.
The review also continues to blur the distinction between project completion and ongoing maintenance, support, configuration changes, and future enhancements. No professional development company can guarantee that a live website will never require updates, troubleshooting, or maintenance after launch. This is precisely why maintenance services exist across the industry.
It is worth noting that the project was reviewed, accepted, and delivered. Yet months later, the narrative has shifted to claims that the platform was never delivered correctly in the first place. These positions are fundamentally inconsistent.
To put this into perspective, if a customer receives a meal, consumes it, accepts a replacement or accommodation for any concern raised, and later claims that no meal was ever served, it reflects a contradiction in the narrative. Similarly, a project that has been reviewed, approved, delivered, and accepted cannot reasonably be portrayed as though no value was provided simply because disagreements arise after completion.
We also reject the assertion that WordPress and PHP are obsolete technologies. Both remain widely used, actively maintained, and commercially supported technologies worldwide, and their use was clearly part of the agreed solution.
We maintain comprehensive records of the project's proposals, approvals, revisions, communications, deliverables, and post-launch correspondence. These records will continue to be provided to Trustpilot so the matter can be evaluated based on documented facts rather than changing allegations.
We stand by the work delivered, the professionalism of our team, and the contractual obligations we fulfilled.
Regards,
American Web Builders.